Brute Manufacturing Ltd. operated a manufacturing business and was under the supervision of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act. With the court’s approval they sold certain heavy equipment to Steelcraft, including a large spray booth used in the process of painting large equipment. But they were also a tenant of Bangor Metals Corp. at the time of the sale and Bangor claimed they were entitled to the spray booth as a permanent fixture. Explain the arguments for both sides and who would likely be ultimately entitled to the spray booth. Would it affect your answer to know that the spray booth was very large, was fastened to the floor and roof and connected to the electrical and natural gas supply? What if the terms of the lease provided it could not be removed without the permission of the landlord?