1. The lease between RRE and Chalk Supply required a security deposit to cover any default on...
Question:
1. The lease between RRE and Chalk Supply required a security deposit to cover any default on a month’s rent by the tenant. Chalk Supply did not pay the deposit. Should the court have ruled that this breach prevented Chalk Supply from prevailing on its claim against RRE? Discuss.
2. Suppose that RRE had received an estimate of the cost of the fire suppression system before the parties executed the lease and had then insisted on conditioning its payment on a longer term. Would the result in this case have been different? Explain.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: