Devin Fink was the manager of Precision Tune Auto Care in Charlotte, North Carolina. Randall Stywall brought her car to the shop to have the rear shocks replaced. Fink filled out the service order with an estimate of the cost. Later, Stywall returned to pick up her car, and Fink collected payment for the work. When Stywall started to drive away, however, the car bounced as if the shocks had not been replaced. A complaint to Precision’s corporate office resulted in the discovery that, in fact, the work had not been done and Fink had kept the payment. He was charged with larceny against his employer. He argued that he had not committed this crime because the victim was Stywall, not Precision. Which agency principles support the charge against Fink? Explain. [State of North Carolina v. Fink, 798 S.E.2d 537 (2017)] (See Scope of Agent’s Authority.)