Ginger uses the wrong type of cleaner fluid to clean out the deep fryer in her café and causes an explosion. The explosion causes the café’s front window to shatter, and a pedestrian walking on the public sidewalk in front of the café at the time of the explosion is injured. In a suit against Ginger for negligence:

a. Ginger wins because she owed no duty to the pedestrian.

b. Ginger wins because there is not sufficient proximate cause.

c. The pedestrian wins because Ginger owes him a special duty.

d. The pedestrian wins because Ginger’s actions were the cause and proximate cause of the injury.

e. The pedestrian wins due to strict liability.