4. Does the Gibbs rationale for pendent jurisdiction justify an analogous doctrine of

“pendent” personal jurisdiction, for example, in a suit in which defendant is amenable to jurisdiction pursuant to a federal statute allowing for nationwide service of process, but personal jurisdiction cannot be exercised over a joined state law claim? To what extent does the constitutional basis for the two doctrines differ? See 4A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice

& Procedure: Civil 3d §1069.7.