Suppose we were to implement remote file system mounting using an unreliable RPC protocol that offers zero-or-more semantics. If a message reply is received, this improves to at-least-once semantics.

We define read(n) to return the specified nth block rather than the next block in sequence; this way, reading once is the same as reading twice, and at-least-once semantics is thus the same as exactly once.

(a) For what other file system operations is there no difference between at-least-once and exactly once semantics? Consider open, create, write, seek, opendir, readdir, mkdir, delete (a.k.a.

unlink), and rmdir.

(b) For the remaining operations, which can have their semantics altered to achieve equivalence of at-least-once and exactly once? What file system operations are irreconcilable with atleast-once semantics?

(c) Suppose the semantics of the rmdir system call are now that the given directory is removed if it exists, and nothing is done otherwise. How could you write a program to delete directories that distinguishes between these two cases?