Proponents of ban on advertising of alcohol and tobacco products argue that restricting advertising will lead to

Question:

Proponents of ban on advertising of alcohol and tobacco products argue that restricting advertising will lead to fewer sales and hence, lesser detrimental effects. Opponents of the ban counterargue that banning truthful and non-misleading advertising is unconstitutional and restriction of freedom. They say that it’s unfair to ban advertising, since the product itself is not banned. They also cite examples of countries where alcohol consumption has decreased despite an increase in advertising. Which view do you agree with? Also, while authorities have enforced bans and restrictions, companies have found ways to get around legalities. Argue about the ethical nature of such advertising.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: