A company with locations in three cities plans to give 200 achievement awards that shall be apportioned to the three cities by population. City A with 9,150 employees is allotted 61 awards, City B with 6,040 employees is allotted 40 awards, and City C with 14,810 employees is allotted 99 awards to distribute. Then it is discovered that the number of employees is out of date. The awards are reallocated based on the new populations: City A with 9,180; City B with 6,040; and City C with 14,930. It turns out that the apportionment remains the same.

Determine whether the scenario violates the population paradox. Justify your answer.