Question: Here is an improved version of the scheme given in the previous problem. As before, we have a global elliptic curve, prime (p), and generator
Here is an improved version of the scheme given in the previous problem. As before, we have a global elliptic curve, prime \(p\), and "generator" \(G\). Alice picks a private signing key \(X_{A}\) and forms the public verifying key \(Y_{A}=X_{A} G\). To sign a message \(M\) :
- Bob picks a value \(k\).
- Bob sends Alice \(C_{1}=k G\).
- Alice sends Bob \(M\) and the signature \(S=M-X_{A} C_{1}\).
- Bob verifies that \(M=S+k Y_{A}\).
a. Show that this scheme works. That is, show that the verification process produces an equality if the signature is valid.
b. Show that forging a message in this scheme is as hard as breaking (ElGamal) elliptic curve cryptography. (Or find an easier way to forge a message?)
c. This scheme has an extra "pass" compared to other cryptosystems and signature schemes we have looked at. What are some drawbacks to this?
Step by Step Solution
3.38 Rating (154 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
a Sk YAMxA C1k YAMxA k Gk xA GM b Suppose an imposter has an alg... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
