In an effort to explain regional wage differentials, you collect wage data from 7,338 unskilled workers, divide

Question:

In an effort to explain regional wage differentials, you collect wage data from 7,338 unskilled workers, divide the country into four regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, and West), and estimate the following equation (standard errors in parentheses):

Î = 4.78 – 0.038E, – 0.041S, – 0.048W, (0.019) (0.010) (0.012) R? = .49 N = 7,338


Where:

Yi = the hourly wage (in dollars) of the ith unskilled worker

Ei = a dummy variable equal to 1 if the ith worker lives in the Northeast, 0 otherwise

Si = a dummy variable equal to 1 if the ith worker lives in the South, 0 otherwise

Wi = a dummy variable equal to 1 if the ith worker lives in the West, 0 otherwise

a. What is the omitted condition in this equation?

b. If you add a dummy variable for the omitted condition to the equation without dropping Ei, Si, or Wi, what will happen?

c. If you add a dummy variable for the omitted condition to the equation and drop Ei, what will the sign of the new variable€™s estimated coefficient be?

d. Which of the following three statements is most correct? Least correct?

Explain your answers.

i. The equation explains 49 percent of the variation of Y around its mean with regional variables alone, so there must be quite a bit of wage variation by region.

ii. The coefficients of the regional variables are virtually identical, so there must not be much wage variation by region.

iii. The coefficients of the regional variables are quite small compared with the average wage, so there must not be much wage variation by region.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: