Since 1986 the Economist has been publishing the Big Mac Index as a crude, and hilarious, measure

Question:

Since 1986 the Economist has been publishing the Big Mac Index as a crude, and hilarious, measure of whether international currencies are at their €œcorrect€ exchange rate, as judged by the theory of purchasing power parity (PPP). The PPP holds that a unit of currency should be able to buy the same bundle of goods in all countries. The proponents of PPP argue that, in the long run, currencies tend to move toward their PPP. The Economist uses McDonald€™s Big Mac as a representative bundle and gives the information in following table.

Under (-)/ Over (+) Valuation Actual Dollar Big Mac Prices In Local Currency Implied PPPSouth Africa Rand 15.5 Won 2,900 Rupee 190 4.81 901 59.0 9.94 1.96 23.3 19.3 7.25 942 109 6.97 1.25 32.9 34.7 1.41 3.67


Consider the following regression model:
 Yi = β1 + β2Xi + ui
 where Y = actual exchange rate and X = implied PPP of the dollar.


a. If the PPP holds, what values of β1 and β2 would you expect a priori?

b. Do the regression results support your expectation? What formal test do you use to test your hypothesis?
c. Should the Economist continue to publish the Big Mac Index? Why or why not?


Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Basic Econometrics

ISBN: 978-0073375779

5th edition

Authors: Damodar N. Gujrati, Dawn C. Porter

Question Posted: