Question: Referring to (3.29), this exercise provides a direct proof that which is straightforward once the solution is known. Define so that Next, let so that
Referring to (3.29), this exercise provides a direct proof that
![=l S (p)=(") [p - p)]" = 2p 1-2p P](https://dsd5zvtm8ll6.cloudfront.net/images/question_images/1734/3/5/1/49367601a85e0d621734351494271.jpg)
which is straightforward once the solution is known. Define

so that

Next, let
![]()
so that the relation for S (p) is equivalent to showing that h (p) = 1. Clearly

is zero, so that
![]()
Thus, if h (p) = g (p) (1 − 2p) − 2g (p) can be shown to be zero, it follows that h (p) = 1 for all p ∈
0, 1/2) so that, in turn, the proof of the closed-form solution to S (p) is established for all p ∈
0, 1/2). Show that g (p) (1 − 2p) = 2g (p).
(Contributed by Markus Haas)
=l S (p)=(") [p - p)]" = 2p 1-2p P
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
