A Question of EthicsPromissory Estoppel. Claudia Aceves borrowed $845,000 from U.S. Bank to buy a home. Less

Question:

A Question of Ethics—Promissory Estoppel. Claudia Aceves borrowed $845,000 from U.S. Bank to buy a home.

Less than two years into the loan, she could no longer afford the monthly payments. The bank notified her that it planned to foreclose on her home. (Foreclosure is a process that allows a lender to repossess and sell the property that secures a loan—see Chapter 22.) The bank offered to modify Aceves’s mortgage if she would forgo bankruptcy. In reliance on the bank’s promise, she agreed. Once she withdrew the filing, however, the bank foreclosed and began eviction proceedings.

Aceves filed a suit against the bank for promissory estoppel. [Aceves v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 192 Cal.App.4th 218, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 507 (2 Dist. 2011)] (See page 286.)

1. Could Aceves succeed in her claim of promissory estoppel?

Why or why not?

2. Did Aceves or U.S. Bank behave unethically? Discuss.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Business Law Today

ISBN: 9781285528632

10th Edition

Authors: Roger Miller

Question Posted: