Case law from the ECtHR illustrates that a state party to the ECHR is not always bound
Question:
Case law from the ECtHR illustrates that a state party to the ECHR is not always bound by its obligations under the Convention when it acts abroad.
Why could that be problematic when considered from the perspective of the alleged universal nature of human rights law?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: