A university professor who has conducted research for many years of his career submitted a grant to the NIH to request funding to integrate a Spanish-Language Hospice video in the discharge planning processes for a number of hospitals surrounding the university. The grant application, which was very prescriptive, detailed, and time-consuming, was scored and returned.

The professor, who is the principal investigator, saw the value of conducting a small-scale feasibility study in one hospital with the intent to use those results to leverage another NIH grant application. The Spanish-Language Hospice video would be incorporated into the palliative care process, whereby Latino patients with palliative care and end-of-life needs would be triaged to watch the video with their family before discharge and prior to an order being written for hospice services. Data would be gathered before and after the video is watched, the results analyzed, and a feasibility index calculated. He engages a DNP as Co-I who will assist with the feasibility project design and execution, prepare the project for presentation to the IRB, guide the palliative care NP, and, in general, act as liaison to the hospital.

A. What types of data should be gathered before and after the video intervention?

B. What types of considerations should be given to the patient and/or family regarding participation in the study?

C. As the Co-I, you have never participated in a feasibility study; how does this align with the DNP scope of practice focus being on applying EBP?

D. You are asked as the Co-I to calculate the feasibility index. What do you need in order to complete this task?

E. What quantitative and qualitative data will be important to take away from this study to assist the professor in rewriting the NIH grant application?

AppendixLO1