For each numbered statement that is not a premise in each of the formal proofs that follow,
Question:
For each numbered statement that is not a premise in each of the formal proofs that follow, state the rule of inference that justifies it.
1. (H ꓦ I) ⊃ [J ⋅ (K ⋅ L)]
2. I
∴ J ⋅ K
3. I ꓦ H
4. H ꓦ I
5. J ⋅ (K ⋅ L)
6. (J ⋅ K) ⋅ L
7. J ⋅ K
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Introduction To Logic
ISBN: 9781138500860
15th Edition
Authors: Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen, Victor Rodych
Question Posted: