In this case, the issue was similar to that of the Virginia case previously discussed, but the facts and arguments were sufficiently different to produce a different result. This case reports a challenge to the constitutionality of a New Jersey law that classified as “grossly unprofessional conduct” any offer by a pharmacist to provide discounts or rebates on the sale of drugs or medications. As you read this case, ask yourself how the case differs, if it does, from the preceding Virginia case.

What issues in this case differ from the issues in that case? How do the arguments in this case differ from the arguments in that case?