The analysis described in Problem 1 for the posture measurement data on Shoulder Flexion (SF) may be

Question:

The analysis described in Problem 1 for the posture measurement data on Shoulder Flexion (SF) may be criticized because information is lost when the 4 observations for a given subject on a given day are combined into an average score rather than being treated individually in the analysis. The data set shown below allows for an analysis t considers all 12 observations per subject. In analyzing this data set, we assume that the 4 observations for a given subject on a given day are true replicates (i.e., we assume that neither the time of day observed nor the rater used, factors that combine to provide the 4 observations for a given subject, is an important factor for predicting SF response).

image text in transcribed
a. How should the subject-specific scalar model for Problem 1 be modified to consider the data layout below? (You will need to add a second random effect to the model that reflects the interaction of Day with Subjects.)
b. Use the computer information provided below to test whether there is a significant main effect of the factor Day. (See the ANOVA table provided below.) What do you conclude?
c. Use the computer output provided below to test whether there is a significant interaction effect between Subjects and Day. If such a test is nonsignificant, why might you be concerned regarding the model that has been fit, and how might you redo the analysis?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question

Applied Regression Analysis And Other Multivariable Methods

ISBN: 632

5th Edition

Authors: David G. Kleinbaum, Lawrence L. Kupper, Azhar Nizam, Eli S. Rosenberg

Question Posted: