The time of performance reviews is often a time of genuine anxiety for many organizational members. On the one hand, it is an important organizational ritual and a key part of the Human Resource function. Organizations usually codify the process and provide a mechanism to appraise performance. On the other hand, it is rare for managers to feel comfortable with this process. Often, they feel discomfort over “playing God.” One possible reason for this is that managers rarely receive formal training about how to provide feedback.

From the manager’s point of view, if done properly, giving feedback is at the very heart of his or her job as “coach” and “teacher.” It is an investment in the professional development of another person, rather than the punitive element we so often associate with hearing from “the boss.” From the subordinate’s perspective, most people want to know where they stand, but this is usually tempered by a fear of “getting it in the neck.” In many organizations, it is rare to receive straight, non-sugar-coated feedback about where you stand.

Procedure 1. Review the section of the book dealing with feedback before you come to class. It is also helpful if individuals make notes about their perceptions and feelings about the course before they come to class.

2. Groups of students should discuss their experiences, both positive and negative, in this class. Each group should determine the dimensions of evaluating the class itself and the instructor. For example, students might select criteria that include the practicality of the course, the way the material is structured and presented (e.g., lecture or exercises), and the instructor’s style (e.g., enthusiasm, fairness).

3. Groups select a member to represent them in a subgroup that next provides feedback to the instructor before the entire class.

4. The student audience then provides the subgroup with feedback about their effectiveness in this exercise. That is, the larger class provides feedback to the subgroup about the extent to which students actually put the principles of effective feedback into practice (e.g., descriptive, not evaluative; specific, not general).