Network neutrality is an operating model under which Internet service providers (ISPs) must allow customers equal access to content and applications, regardless of the source or nature of the content.

That is, Internet backbone carriers must treat all web traffic equally, not charging different rates by user, content, site, platform, or application.

Telecommunications and cable companies want to replace network neutrality with an arrangement in which they can charge differentiated prices based on the amount of bandwidth consumed by the content that is being delivered over the Internet. ISPs further contend that net neutrality hinders international competitiveness by decreasing innovation and discouraging capital investments in new network technologies. Without such investments and innovations, ISPs will be unable to handle the exploding demand for Internet and wireless data transmission.

From the opposite perspective, proponents of network neutrality argue that the risk of censorship increases when network providers can selectively block or slow access to certain content, such as access to competing low-cost services such as Skype and Vonage. They also assert that a neutral Internet encourages innovation. Finally, they contend that the neutral Internet has helped to create many new businesses.

a. How do you feel about the net neutrality issue?

b. Do you believe heavier bandwidth users should pay for more bandwidth?

c. Do you believe wireless carriers should operate under different rules from wireline carriers?

d. Evaluate your own bandwidth usage. (For example: Do you upload and download large files such as movies?) If network neutrality were to be eliminated, what would the impact be for you?