=+e. In part A, we held the consumers indifference curve in the graph fixed and argued that

Question:

=+e. In part A, we held the consumer’s indifference curve in the graph fixed and argued that it is reasonable to approximate the consumer’s behavior this way given that apple expenditures are typically a small fraction of a consumer’s budget. Can you explain how what you just did in part B is different?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!