69. Exercise 63 from Chapter 7 introduced regression through the origin to relate a dependent variable y
Question:
69. Exercise 63 from Chapter 7 introduced regression through the origin to relate a dependent variable y to an independent variable x. The assumption there was that for any xed x value, the dependent variable is a random variable Y with mean value bx and variance s2 (so that Y has mean value zero when x 0). The data consists of n independent (xi, Yi)
pairs, where each Yi is normally distributed with mean bxi and variance s2. The likelihood is then a product of normal pdf s with different mean values but the same variance.
a. Show that the mle of bis .
b. Verify that the mle of
(a) is unbiased.
c. Obtain an expression for and then for .
d. For purposes of obtaining a precise estimate of b, is it better to have the xi s all close to 0 (the origin)
or spread out quite far above 0? Explain your reasoning.
e. The natural prediction of Yi is . Let which is analogous to our earlier sample variance for a univariate sample X1, . . . , Xn
(in which case is a natural prediction for each Xi). Then it can be shown that T 1b ˆ b2/
X 1n 12 S2 1Xi X22/
1Yi b ˆ xi 22/ 1n 12 S2 b ˆ xi sb V1b ˆ 2 b ˆ
xiYi /x2i and use this to derive a 100(1 a)% CI for u.
b. Verify that P(a1/n Y/u 1) 1
a, and derive a 100(1 a)% CI for u based on this probability statement.
c. Which of the two intervals derived previously is shorter? If my waiting time for a morning bus is uniformly distributed and observed waiting times are x1 4.2, x2 3.5, x3 1.7, x4 1.2, and x5 2.4, derive a 95% CI for u by using the shorter of the two intervals.
Step by Step Answer:
Modern Mathematical Statistics With Applications
ISBN: 9780534404734
1st Edition
Authors: Jay L Devore