3. A student once conducted an evaluation and in a report began analyzing the data along this line: Client A showed the most improvement. This is understandable in that he and his spouse seem to have ironed out the domestic difficulties that have plagued them for the past 4 years. Client B progressed less than other clients. Whether a coincidence or not, this client has not had an intimate relationship in the last 5 years. Client C made minimal progress, possibly because her boyfriend violated his parole and was returned to prison. Client D made great strides after acknowledging her childhood trauma. Client E made minimal progress, possibly because of her surgery and time away from the group. What is wrong with analyzing data in this manner? If the report consisted of only this type of information, would you conclude that there had been an analysis of the data?