2. Under the contract, the purchasing price will vary depending on the average wattage of the generators. Val-Nam has agreed to test a random sampling of the generators and the purchase price will be set based on the average wattage of the random sampling. Val-Nam conducted the test and placed the generators in the loading dock for shipment but has not yet confirmed with XL that the tests were completed and what the final purchase price will be. Who had title to the generators when the fire broke out?

3. XL's purchasing manager called Val-Nam and placed an order fd0r 100 generators. Gyan Singh explained that Val-Nam is currently out of stock but that they should be getting new stock the following week. The parties agreed that Gyan would email XL when the generators were ready for shipment to XL. When the generators arrived at Val-Nam the following week, Gyan separated 100 from the shipment and placed them on the loading dock. They were wrapped and labelled for delivery to XL. Gyan emailed XL indicating that the following generator were ready for shipment. Who had title to the generators when the fire broke out?

4. According to the terms of contract, Val-Nam was to repack the generators in XL-branded packing. The generator had not yet been repacked when the fire broke out. Who had title to the generators when the fire broke out?

Now consider this circumstance:

Each month, Val-Nam delivers 100 generators to XL. Under the term of the contact, XL has the right to return any unsold generators within 30 days of delivery

5. There are no terms in the contact relating to the transfer of title. On April 10^th, Val-Nam delivers 100 Generators to XL, on April 11, XL's store is broken into and 10 of the generators are stolen. Who had the title to the generators when they were stolen?