Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1. Accounting for the transfer of receivables with recourse remains problematic. At issue is whether such a transaction is, in substance, a sale, in which

1. Accounting for the transfer of receivables with recourse remains problematic. At issue is whether such a transaction is, in substance, a sale, in which case a gain/loss is recognized, or a financing transaction, in which case any gain/loss is amortized over the original life of the receivable. (The receivable could be long-term; for example, a sale of an interest-bearing note.) SOP 74-6 concluded that most transfers with recourse are financing transactions based on the argument that a transfer of risk (i.e., no recourse) must exist for a sale to have occurred. In 1983, the FASB reached a different conclusion in SFAS No. 77. A sale is now recognized if (a) the seller surrenders control of future economic benefits embodied in the receivable and (b) the seller ' s obligation under the recourse provisions can be reasonably estimated. If these conditions are not met, the proceeds from a transfer are reported on the balance sheet as a liability.

Required: a. Explain why SOP 74-6 view represents a revenue expense orientation, while SFAS No. 77 represents an asset liability orientation.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Accounting The Basis For Business Decisions

Authors: Robert F. Meigs, Jan R. Williams, Susan F Haka, Mark S. Bettner

International 11th Edition

007115809X, 978-0071158091

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions