1. Amanda lent her car to her friend Deana to pick up a pizza that the two had ordered for dinner. Deana drove the car to a shopping mall where the pizza was being made and parked her car in the mall's parking lot. Instead of going directly to pick up the food from the restaurant, Deana went to a makeup store and eventually purchased some hand lotion. Deana then went to the restaurant and picked up the pizza, which had been ready for 15 minutes. Just as Deana was walking toward the car, another driver, Tammy, struck and hit Amanda's parked car damaging a rear fender. Amanda did not carry collision insurance, and the car required almost $2,000 worth of body and paint work. If Amanda sues Deana on a negligence theory for damage to the car, who will win? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Amanda, because Deana exceed her authority when she went to the makeup store. 0 8. Amanda, because but for Deana's delay, Amandeep's car would not have been damaged. 0 C. Deana, because she did not create a forseeable risk of damage to Amanda's car. 0 D. Deana, because the permissive use doctrine imputes any of Deana's negligence to Amanda