Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
(1) Below are measurements on the acceleration of 0.1 kg and 1.0 kg freely falling objects. Acceleration a (m/s2) Trial 3 8.967 9.398 Mass 0.1
(1) Below are measurements on the acceleration of 0.1 kg and 1.0 kg freely falling objects. Acceleration a (m/s2) Trial 3 8.967 9.398 Mass 0.1 kg 1 kg Trial 1 9.190 9.345 Trial 2 9.250 9.494 Trial 4 9.581 8.976 Trial 5 9.364 9.364 Follow the steps below to analyze the data in EXCEL and record in Pre-lab. (If you are not familiar with the statistical analysis, review Lab 1. If you do not have access to a computer, follow the method in Lab 1 to do calculations.) a. Key in the N data points in A1, ..., AN, respectively. b. In B1, type" AVERAGE(A1:AN)" and press ENTER. B1 shows the mean. c. In C1, type"-STDEV(A1:AN)" and press ENTER. C1 shows the standard deviation . d. SEOM can be directly calculated as NN i. ii. From your analysis, does the experiment support the hypothesis "a more massive object falls faster than a less massive one"? What is your reason? (Hint: your reason should be based on a comparison between the mean and SEOM of the two cases.) (1) i. Analyze the data and fill in the table below [4] Acceleration a (m/s2) Mass 0.1 kg 1 kg Mean SEOM Result reported as ii. Does the experiment support the hypothesis? What is your reason? [3] Answer: (1) Below are measurements on the acceleration of 0.1 kg and 1.0 kg freely falling objects. Acceleration a (m/s2) Trial 3 8.967 9.398 Mass 0.1 kg 1 kg Trial 1 9.190 9.345 Trial 2 9.250 9.494 Trial 4 9.581 8.976 Trial 5 9.364 9.364 Follow the steps below to analyze the data in EXCEL and record in Pre-lab. (If you are not familiar with the statistical analysis, review Lab 1. If you do not have access to a computer, follow the method in Lab 1 to do calculations.) a. Key in the N data points in A1, ..., AN, respectively. b. In B1, type" AVERAGE(A1:AN)" and press ENTER. B1 shows the mean. c. In C1, type"-STDEV(A1:AN)" and press ENTER. C1 shows the standard deviation . d. SEOM can be directly calculated as NN i. ii. From your analysis, does the experiment support the hypothesis "a more massive object falls faster than a less massive one"? What is your reason? (Hint: your reason should be based on a comparison between the mean and SEOM of the two cases.) (1) i. Analyze the data and fill in the table below [4] Acceleration a (m/s2) Mass 0.1 kg 1 kg Mean SEOM Result reported as ii. Does the experiment support the hypothesis? What is your reason? [3]
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started