1. Bobby owns a gun that he keeps beneath his pillow. Out on the streets his chances are zero. Bobby also owns a gun shop in Plainfield. He sells everything from handguns to high magazine rifles. Over the years, Bobby's shop has been selling drugs to some of its gun owners. Ralphie, a 19 year old boy purchased some heroin from Bobby. While cleaning out Ralphie's room, his mother found the heroin. Ralphie told her where he purchased it from. She contacted law enforcement and the police immediately drove to Bobby's gun shop and broke down the door. They searched the entire establishment until they located the drugs inside a locked closet. Will the drugs be suppressed (excluded) at trial?

Group of answer choices

Yes, because even though police had probable cause, they needed to obtain a warrant before executing the search

Yes, because this violates the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule

No, because a warrant is not needed to search highly regulated areas

None of the above

No, because the mother was a credible informant who provided a basis of knowledge

2

On Monday, Ricky telephoned his friend Fred and offered to sell him his 1975 Cadillac for $2500. Fred replied that he wasn't sure if he wanted to buy it at that price but told Ricky to keep the offer open until Friday and he will have an answer for him. On Thursday of the same week, Ricky sells the car to Babba Lou. Which of the following is true?

Group of answer choices

Ricky breached his contract with Fred because consideration is present

3

Stanley is climbing a tree in his yard. Suddenly he slips and falls. Luckily he lands on a large branch where he can hold on. Stanley is about twenty feet above the ground and dangling in mid-air. Ben is walking down the street and hears Stanley yelling for help. Ben sees Stanley and catches him when he falls. Stanley thanks Ben and tells him he will send him a check for $100 for his efforts. Stanley never sends the check. Can Ben recover the money?

Group of answer choices

Yes, because Ben's act was gratuitous

Yes, under promissory estoppel

No, because the promise was not in writing

No, because the promise did not induce the detriment

Ricky and Fred created an option contract

Ricky could not revoke his offer with Fred because Fred accepted the offer

Ricky has a valid contract with Babba Lou

Babba Lou must return the vehicle to Ricky and Ricky must return the money to Babba Lou