Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1. By statute, piercing the corporate veil is also an option for a plaintiff when a limited liability company is involved. T/F 2. Which of

1. By statute, piercing the corporate veil is also an option for a plaintiff when a limited liability company is involved. T/F

2. Which of the following would be appropriate for an accountant to use when the accountant has conducted such a limited audit that the accountant does not feel able to offer an opinion as to the accuracy of financial statements?

-Unqualified opinion

-Qualified opinion

-Disclaimer

-Warranty

3. Which of the following must be established in order to hold an accountant liable for fraud?

  • That the accountant acted with specific intent meaning that, while the accountant did not intend fraud, the result of the accountants actions resulted in the client defrauding a third party.

  • That the accountant acted with scienter meaning that the accountant failed to act as a reasonable accountant under the circumstances.

  • That the accountant acted with specific intent meaning that the accountant intended to mislead the client or third parties.

  • That the accountant acted with scienter meaning that the accountant knew of the falsity of a statement; or, when making the statement, he or she recklessly disregarded the truth.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Analysing Financial Statements For Non-Specialists

Authors: Jim OHare

2nd Edition

1138641529, 9781138641525

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions