Question
1. Comment on statement as follows: The International Court of Justice cannot review the decisions of organs of the United Nations. With reference to case
1. Comment on statement as follows: "The International Court of Justice cannot review the decisions of organs of the United Nations." With reference to case law, consider to what extent this statement reflects the practice of the Court.
2.Comment on statement as follows: "There are many ways in which non-members of international organisations can recognize the legal personality of such organisations."
3.Comment on statement as follows: "To say that an international organisation has legal personality is to mean nothing more than that an international organisation is a person of its own. There are no consequences of such legal personality. It is nothing more than a nicety."
4Comment on statement as follows: "Article 2. Legal status of the ICRC is an association governed by Article 60 and following of the Swiss Civil Code. In order to fulfil its humanitarian mandate and mission, the ICRC enjoys a status equivalent to that of an international organization and has international legal personality in carrying out its work." (Statutes of the International Committee of the Red Cross, 2017).
5.Mankind as a subject of international law.
6.Nation as subject of international law.
7.Free cities
8.Holy See
9.Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta
10.National liberation movements
11Explain the difference between 'subject of international law' and 'subject of international relations'. 12 Role of individuals in contemporary international law.
13 Why the international legal personality of individuals appears to be more readily accepted by scholars than the international legal personality of (international) non-governmental organisations?
14.Comment on statement as follows: "Although international law increasingly gives rights to, and imposes obligations on (natural or legal) persons, the notion that they therefore enjoy rights and obligations under international law can lead to misunderstandings. Such rights and obligations can be enforced by, or against, persons only through action by States. Persons only can enjoy rights under international law if States have agreed to this." (A. Aust)
15. Comment on statement as follows: "Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities, and only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be enforced.' (Judgment of the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 1946)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started