1) Describe two legal standards that federal appellate courts (for example, the U.S. of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) use to evaluate appeals of federal agency decisions.

2)Explain and contrast how the concept of foreseeability factored into the decisions in Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company, 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (1981), and Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339 (1928)

3) What was the holding in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) and how did the holding in New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984) modify Miranda? Please provide an example