$1.$ Detail the overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case $($See Exhibit OL$-1).$ What are the advantages and disadvantages of this design? $2.$ Evaluate the MET process $($Exhibit OL$-2).$ What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MET technique? $3.$ What measurement scales are used in the sample questions provided $($Exhibit OL$-3)?$ Why might the lottery attitude and lottery importance questions have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers? $4.$ Using text Exhibit $13-4,$ map out the likely quantitative instrument content. $5.$ The survey contained several questions that would alert the researchers that the participant was not taking the research process seriously $($see case exhibit OL$-3).$ Is this a good or a poor idea? Why? $6.$ Evaluate the MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research.