1. Does the author describe how gentrification of the town has lost its sense of history in the end of the article?

2. What role do local officials have in preserving the historical significance of sights?

3. Is there anything wrong with businesses taking advantage of the "tourist" climate despite the historical events that took place on the very site? Why or why not?

https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/travel/echoes-from-the-roman-ghetto.html