1. How does the case of Naruto the macaque highlight the complexities surrounding copyright ownership and the legal representation of nonhuman entities? 2. What role did People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) play in representing Naruto's copyright claim, and how did the court assess PETA's actions in the case? 3. What were the key factors considered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in determining Naruto's eligibility for copyright protection, and what were the implications of the court's ruling? 4. In what ways did the case of Naruto the macaque contribute to the ongoing debate about the intersection of animal rights, intellectual property law, and the limitations of copyright protection for nonhuman animals?