Question
1.) Identify and contrast the affirmative defenses, and define the phrase the defendant is competent to stand trial. b). Describe the implications of the Jackson
1.) Identify and contrast the affirmative defenses, and define the phrase "the defendant is competent to stand trial." b). Describe the implications of the Jackson v. Indiana Supreme Court ruling for state competency and criminal responsibility. Do you think the case is valid? Why not, and why not?
2). Describe the "Castle Doctrine" and the main factors that have caused it to evolve throughout time. b). Compare and contrast "Make my Day" guidelines with the "Castle Doctrine". Which, and why, do you agree with? c). Is it appropriate for a homeowner to defend their property against an intoxicated intruder who enters their residence, fires a gunshot in the back, and flees from the owner's bedroom? Why not, and why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started