1: If Connors wants to effectively manage risk in this situation, what would be a good response to Fuller, who is threatening to get a lawyer? Does Connors have an opportunity to mitigate the risk? How? Describe the best course of action you recommend and support your action choice with good HRM practices. Q2: Discuss the issues incorporating concepts from Chapter 3 as well as from the human perspective. You have a person, you have managers, and you have a company, all having various sensitivities. I gave some ideas to consider when you respond to this reflective question. Q3: Connors is the HRM guy. What should he do to review this matter? Are there any items you recommend Connors examine before his meeting with the hiring authority? Hint: Where do we describe what employees should do, and where do we describe the physical requirements of a job? We need some objective way to measure Dean's ability to do the job. Explain why the documents may be helpful for Connors to look at. Q4: Related to Q3. If Sablic wants to show that he hired the best applicant for the job, and that he based his decision on objective criteria, how