Question
Please read Smith v. Goguen , 415 U.S. 566 (1974), available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14723025391522670978&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr After reading the above case, discuss whether you agree or disagree with
Please readSmith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974), available at
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14723025391522670978&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
After reading the above case, discuss whether you agree or disagree with the Court's holding that the language in the Massachusetts statute, "treats contemptuously" is unconstitutionally vague. Why do you agree or disagree and what, in your opinion, is the most significant impact of whether it is unconstitutionally vague? Be sure to use a minimum of two resources to support your thoughts.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Courts Holding and Analysis In the case Smith v Goguen 415 US 566 1974 the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Massachusetts statute which criminalized treating the American flag contemptuously ...
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Constitutional Law And Politics Volume 2 Civil Rights And Civil Liberties
Authors: David M. O Brien, Gordon Silverstein
11th Edition
039369674X, 978-0393696745
