$(1)$ In general, the most critical element of an offer is mutual intent $("$meeting of the minds" or "manifested intent"$)$ as found in your textbook. Thus, in general, a question cannot serve as an offer, but as a mere inquiry as it lacks a manifested intent to be bound. Furthermore, since a counteroffer is an offer, it follows the same rules as an offer $-$ it must manifest an intent to be bound. Thus, what is the legal effect of Hallie's question when forming a contract: is it a counter$-$offer? Or is it a mere inquiry? Explain and quote your textbook For example, in your answer, state "The legal effect of Hallie's question in this case is XXX$.$ Why? The textbook on page XXX states as follows: $"$XXX$"*$Pay attention to your response here as the next question is dependent on your response, that is$,$ make sure the two answers are consistent! $(2)$ Given the total circumstances between Hallie and Catsaulk, do the parties have a "meeting of the minds" $($Agreement$)?$ Explain and quote your textbook. For example, in your answer, state $"$In the end, Hallie and Catsaulk do$/$do not $($choose one$)$ have a meeting of the minds. Why? The textbook on page XXX states as follows: $"$XXX$"$ Discuss the nature of Agreement $($if any$).($Agreement has only two elements: offer and acceptance$)$ Do NOT discuss Damages, Consideration, Loss, Contract Defenses, etc. Quote from the textbook the relevant section$($s$)$ to support EACH of your answer$($s$).$ NO POINTS for this Category will be awarded without the appropriate, supporting quote$($s$).$ bussiness law $10$th edition cheeseman