Question
1. In the case of Raffles vs. Wichelhaus, the English court held that a contract for the sale of cotton was 1. Void. 2. Voidable
1. In the case of Raffles vs. Wichelhaus, the English court held that a contract for the sale of cotton was 1. Void. 2. Voidable because both parties were mistaken about which ship named Peerless would be carrying the cotton from India to England. 3. Voidable because the English company mistakenly agreed to pay too much for the cotton. 4. Fully enforceable.
A quasi contract is a contract which is implied by law
1. | to avoid unjust enrichment. | |
2. | to carry out the express agreement of the parties. | |
3. | to punish a wrongdoer. | |
4. | to reward the vigilant, not those who sit on their rights. |
-
The rejection of an offer is effective when
1. the offeror revokes the offer.
2. the offeree rejects the offer and the offeror receives the rejection.
3. the offeree accepts the offer.
4. the offeree asks for more time to consider the offer.
2 points
QUESTION 24
-
Doug offers to sell his home to Mary for $350,000. Mary responds: "Your price seems a little high. Can you do any better?" Mary's response is
1. a counter-offer.
2. a rejection of the original offer and a new offer.
3. the creation of a new offer only.
4. an invitation for further negotiations.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started