Question
1. In which of the following cases did the court decide that the contract was valid but illegal as performed? Select one:a.St John Shipping Corporation
1. In which of the following cases did the court decide that the contract was valid but illegal as performed? Select one:a.St John Shipping Corporation v Joseph Rank Ltd [1957] 1 QB 267.
b.Yango Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v First Chicago Australia Ltd [1978] HCA 42
c.Re Mahmoud v Ispahani [1921] 2 KB 716.
d.Anderson Ltd v Daniel [1924] 1 KB 138.
2 Why was the statement found not to be a term in the case of: Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 All ER 325? Select one:
a.The statement was a term.
b.Neither party was in a position to know the truth.
c.The plaintiff buyer had special skills or knowledge in relation to the subject matter.
d.The defendant seller had special skills or knowledge in relation to the subject matter.
3 A term in a contract that attempts to exclude the implied terms of the Australian Consumer Law is void and unenforceable. Select one:
True
False
4. By including the wording 'this agreement is subject to contract' it is clear that the parties do not yet intend to be legally bound to a contract. Select one:
True
False
5 .Under the Sale of Goods Act, goods include accounting services. Select one:
True
False
6. In most Australian jurisdictions, the right to sue for breach of a simple contract is limited to the period of 6 years from the date on which the right of action accrues. Select one:
True
False
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started