1'" . ... . . _ .. ... .. J -What is the difference between an accessory and an accomplice? How does accomplice liability differ from conspiracy liability? What is the actus reus of accomplice liability? What is the actus reus of conspiracy liability? "Consider the Ulvinen case [3637]. Why might a state insulate parents from accomplice liability for aiding after-the fact? What is the difference between being an accessory and offering \"passive approval.\" [37] What is the difference between the mens rea requisite for aiding and abetting and the mens rea necessary for conviction of the underlying crime? -What is the difference between complicity liability and vicarious liability? Your text argues that a corporation does not have mens rea because it does not think. Is this sound? Do you agree? According to Samaha, what must prosecutors do to prove corporate criminal liability? According to Samaha, why might imposing criminal liability on corporations be a bad idea? Do you agree? How do \"parental responsibility\" statutes differ from ordinary vicarious liability laws? Chapter 6- Uncompleted Crimes: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation -What are the philosophical difficulties of inchoate crimes? According to the text, how does the law attempt to resolve these dilemmas? ~What are the elements of attempt? What actus reus? What mens rea? What is the distinction between the standards of \"some steps,\" substantial steps,\" and \"all but the last act\"? -What is the difference between the "dangerous person\" rationale and the \"dangerous conduct\" rationale for criminalizing attempt? -Why should \"mere preparation\" be punished differently than attempt? What is legal impossibility? Can a person be guilty of attempting something that is legally impossible? What is factual impossibility? Can a person be guilty of attempting something that is factually impossible? Why might the treatment of legal impossibility differ from the treatment of factual impossibility? What is the \"traditional\" view about voluntary abandonment? Is this view justified? Why or why not