1) Paul v Constance[1977] 1 All ER 195 is a leading case relevant to which if the three certainties? Explain the facts, the legal issue at stake and the court's decision. Critically evaluate the court's decision in the context of certainty of intention

3) Keech v Sandford[1726] EWHC Ch J76 serves as a precedent for the idea that fiduciary duties are strict.Explain the Court's reasoning in light of subsequent case law.

4) Explain what is meant by the 'dishonest' as an element of 'dishonest assistance' by making reference to the case ofRoyal Brunei Airlines v Tan[1995] UKPC 4