1. The manufacturer, WanTo3 produces products that have a probability to be defective.

These products are divided into batches of 200. Past experience reveals that some

(batches) are of good quality (i.e. p=0.05) and some are of bad quality (i.e. p=0.25). In

addition, 80% of the batches produced are of good quality and 20% of the batches are of

bad quality. These products are then used in an assembly, and before the final assembly

leaves the factory, their consistency is finally determined. At a gross average cost of 15

per item, the manufacturer may either screen each item in a batch and replace defective

products, or use the items directly without screening. Ultimately, if the latter action is taken,

the rework cost is 150 per defective product. For these data, the costs per batch can be

calculated as follows:

p = 0.05 p = 0.25

Screen 3000 3000

Do not Screen 1500 7500

Because screening requires inspectors and equipment scheduling, it is important to make

the decision to screen or not to screen 2 days before the proposed screening takes place.

However, manufacturers can take one item from a batch and submit it to a laboratory, and

it is possible to report the test results (defective or non-defective) before making the screen

/ no-screen decision. The tested object is returned to its batch following the laboratory

examination. The cost of this initial inspection is 175. Also note that the probability that a

random sample item is defective is

0.8 * 0.05 + 0.2 * 0.25 = 0.09,

and the probability that an item in a lot is of good quality given a randomly sampled item

is defective is 0.444 and the probability that an item in a lot is of good quality given a

randomly sampled item is not defective is 0.835. The manufacture wants to minimize his

or her cost.