Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

1. True or False It is the duty of the plaintiff suing a police agency to prove the affirmative defenses involved in the case 2.

1. True or False

It is the duty of the plaintiff suing a police agency to prove the affirmative defenses involved in the case

2. True or False

Contributory negligence is a defense that a law enforcement agency defendant can use in a lawsuit to prevent the plaintiff from collecting damage awards

3. True or False

In a lawsuit, parties cannot continue "discovery" (finding evidence by way ofdepositions, requests to produce etc...) after the jury renders a verdict and during theappeals stage of the case to bring up "new facts" to the appeals judges

4. In a case involving comparative negligence defense:

Is also known as contributory negligence defense

Involves the tory intentional torts
Involves the tort claim of negligence
all of the the responses are correct responses to the question

5. When a police officer is sued civilly for excessive force under the intentional tort of battery it is:

Going to be decided on the basis of "beyond a reasonable doubt"

The plaintiff must prove that they were owed a duty of care by the police officer
The defendant must have "legal standing" for the case to proceed
None of these possible answers are a correct reponse to the question asked

6. If a police department negligently conducts a citizen academy course in which one citizen participant is accidentally shot by a bullet by a participating police officer and sues and gets only 30% of her damages she is suing for, then most likely:

Absolute immunity exists to protect the police department and police officer being sued

Waivers were signed by the citizen participant

Comparative negligence defense is involved here

Contributory negligence defense is involved here

6. When a plaintiff sues a police agency for negligence:

The "duty" element can be satisfied by the plaintiff by proving "actual causation"

The "duty" element can be satisfied by the plaintiff by proving "proximate causation"

The "duty" element cannot be satisfied by the plaintiff by proving a "public duty" owed by the police to the general public

All the above are true statements

None of the above are true statements

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Business Law Text And Cases

Authors: Kenneth W. Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller

15th Edition

0357129636, 978-0357129630

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Relax your shoulders

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Keep your head straight on your shoulders

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Be straight in the back without blowing out the chest

Answered: 1 week ago