$1$ try leftThieves stole equipment from XYZ Inc. A week later, the stolen property was recovered by the police. A police officer named Tanya contacted XYZ Inc and offered to return the property in exchange for a $$5,000$ donation to the Police Benevolent Fund. XYZ Inc's manager originally agreed to pay that amount. Later, however, the company came to believe that its promise is unenforceable. Which of the following statements is TRUE?XYZ Inc's promise is unenforceable as long as the stolen property was worth less than $$5,000.$The officer can successfully sue as long as XYZ Inc knew, when it made the promise, that it was entitled to recover the stolen property for free.OXYZ Inc's promise is unenforceable because the police officer acted contrary to public policy.The officer can successfully sue because past consideration is good consideration.