1. Type of case: Determine the type of case (decision, evaluation, problem diagnosis) and explain the reasoning. 2. State the problem in the case (what decision needs to be made, by whom) hint-see II. Preliminary Problem Statement 3. Organize information by showing high value, conflicting information, and noise. Please use a table to show each factor. Students should show many factors for each column.

Determine the concerns and challenges surrounding the case and briefly explain them.

Perform qualitative and quantitative analysis and discuss several points that would support the problem statement.

Write the essay for the case showing the problem and the possible solutions explored in the research. The essay should have a strong opening and closing. The essay is a compilation of the research conducted in the structure for argument. Cases should be well substantiated with evidence, qualitative and quantitative.

Please use headers for each of the four sections below. 1. Type of case: Determine the type of case (decision, evaluation, problem diagnosis) and explain the reasoning. 2. State the problem in the case (what decision needs to be made, by whom) hint-see ll. Preliminary Problem Statement 3. Organize information by showing high value, conflicting information, and noise. Please use a table to show each factor. Students should show many factors for each column. Example: High Value Conflicting Information Noise List all information in the case study that is List all information from the case study List all information that is irrelevant to of high value to solving dilemma or that is conflicting solving the problem or the case. problem (see preliminary problem statement) Each point should be briefly explained on Each point should be briefly explained on Each point should be briefly explained on a separate row a separate row a separate row Example: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins Example: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of Example: In 2008, Saks was struggling in (1989) concluded that gender stereotypes 1964 does not offer a definition of sex or the face on an onset of online retailers count as sex discrimination. gender yet Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins and the economic recession. does show gender stereotypes as sex discrimination