1. What were the main problems with Lerninhalte's market entry strategy for Malaysia?

2. Most of Lerninhalte's investments were indirect investments. Was this a useful market entry method to meet Lerninhalte's strategic objectives? Why or why not?

3. Malaysia had legislation in place to prevent excess foreign investment in Malaysia property and companies. How might Lerninhalte have entered Malaysia without investing in Malaysian companies?

4. Had foreign investment and takeovers not been limited, was Gerhart right to pay more than the book value for shares in Malaysian competitors? Explain your reasoning.