1. What's the ground of SEC's ruling on Kim Kardashian regarding the EthereumMax crypto advertising? 2. Why does the SEC require that Kardashian not promote any crypto securities for three years? 3. SEC's resources (human capital, litigation cost, etc) are limited, why did SEC pick Kardashian's case? What message does SEC want to deliver? 4. If damage was done (to investors being influenced), does this SEC ruling recover their loss? What's the role of SEC in similar crypto related investment cases, in terms of regulating the market, information disclosure and investor protections?