$1.$Which of the limitations of utilitarian ethics is best illustrated in the ethics insight about the Ford Pinto?

a$.$Not all gains and losses can be accurat

$2.$The textbook states that "Kantian ethics see the consequences of an action as irrelevant" $($p$103).$ It then proceeds to describe Kantian ethics, providing some examples, including one about the ethicality of lying $(2$ paragraphs down$).$

Is the explanation given by the textbook for why lying is unethical based on the consequences of lying, or not?

a$.$It is based on the consequences of lying

b$.$It is NOT based on the consequences of lying

$3.$ Please briefly explain your answer to the previous question.

$4.$Read Weber on Ethics Theories.pdf

This question is intended to test your understanding of Weber's discussion of justice and fairness.

After reading Weber's description of theories of justice and fairness, please complete each sentence below by selecting the best fitting response. You should use each answer just once.

a$.$Allocation of college financial aid is typically considered fair when awarded based on$...($Merit$,$ need, equal shares $)$

b$.$ Pay for work is typically considered fair when awarded based on$...($Merit$,$ need, equal shares $)$

c$.$"One person, one vote" suggests that the fair way to allocate $/$distribute political voting rights is based on$...($Merit$,$ need, equal shares $)$

$5.$ This question is intended to help you see connections between material covered last week $($on cognitive moral development$)$ and this week $($on ethics theories$).$

Based on Weber's Ethics Theories, please order the following types of moral reasoning in order of INCREASING breadth of the focus of analysis $($so the least broad would be first$)$

$-$Convntional reasoning, Post conventional reasoning, pre conventional reasoning

$6.$Weber writes $"...$ the rights decision$-$maker must contend with the challenge of conflicts between rights. There really is no rank ordering of rights to help a decision maker resolve these conflicts, thus opinions may vary as to the best action to be taken based on rights reasoning". Which of the following ethical theories could be used to decide how rights should be allocated when there is a conflict?

A$.$Utilitarianism

B$.$Justice $/$ fairness

C$.$Kant

D$.$All of the above