1. Why would a jury engage in jury nullification? If a jury cannot engage in nullification, what are its alternatives to express a similar view?

2. Imagine you are a juror in a trial, and you are presented two sides of a story by the attorneys involved. How will you decide who is telling the truth, and who is lying? Do you believe you possess the right skills and abilities to discern the truth? What biases, if any, do you possess that may hinder your ability to tell who is telling the truth?

3. Although litigation is rightfully criticized as slow and expensive, res judicata means the parties have only one chance to "get it right." Do you think relaxing the rules of res judicata would help with the expense and time involved in litigating cases?